Monday, 1 August 2022

August 4 date NO ACCIDENT for Pelosi's visit to Taiwan











The word from Chinese state media is that Chinese intelligence now believes that Nancy Pelosi will fly from Clark Air Force Base in the Philippines to Taipei and meet with the Taiwanese president on Thursday, August 4. This is clearly a deliberate provocation by the Biden regime.
 

Pelosi threatening China perilously close to the 77th anniversary of 6th August, 1945, that is, the dropping of the 1st atomic bomb by the USA on Axis power Japan, is clearly intentional. She would do well to take a good look at a pie chart. Our WWII ally China lost 23% of the total number of casualties of WWII. The United States by comparison, despite their Hollywood filmic rhetoric, lost 2%.

On the 4th August 1945, Paul Tibbets briefed his crewmates aboard the Enola Gay on the upcoming USA bombing mission to Hiroshima, saying the bombs would be immensely powerful and "something new in the history of warfare", but gave no specifics. 

Since the USA fought mainly in the Pacific, their enemy was principally Japan. The Nips, the Japs, they called them. Asians were anathema to them. Nancy Pelosi was 5 years old when her country dropped the 1st atomic bomb in the world on an Asian country far away. She would remember that day clearly. It was a mammoth day in American and world history. Does Nancy still harbour a xenophobia, a racist attitude towards Asians which would include all the "slanty-eyed" people?

It would explain how she would position herself in this conflict; insinuate herself into Taiwanese  society, and smilingly hold out a big pot of money to those corrupt Taipei officials who are quite prepared to sell their country's oil and gas in the South China Sea to an openly hostile nation.

Having lost in the debacle that is Ukraine, and finding themselves bereft of gas and oil under the Russian sanctions they themselves imposed; USA has now turned its attention to China's wealth of natural resources for poaching.

The US constitution specifically says foreign policy belongs to the executive branch "with the advice and consent of the Senate." Pelosi is in the House, not the Senate, so I can't figure out why she would be involved at all in a decision of this nature and magnitude: one having such dire repercussions for the USA and the world.

The US still acknowledges the one China policy, and from this perspective also, Pelosi's visit will be a contravention of their stated foreign policy to China and the world.

So, what the hell does she think she is doing? To score a point which is clearly personal, she is subjecting the whole world to the threat of WWIII? Biden says she is independent of him which of course is BS! If he can't reign the House Speaker in, there's no hope for the US or their allies.

The question also arises, "At 82 years of age, has she been moved to the expendables list?"

Fasten your seatbelts folks. I am expecting Chinese jets to join the USA ones flying into Taipei as a show of strength. Maybe they'll try to head off the US squadron, and force them to return to the Philippines. I don't wish her any harm, but I hope Nancy craps her daks. Luckily she'll be wearing incontinence panties.

 

 

Saturday, 27 March 2021

Suez Canal aka Sue's Canal

 



Suez Canal – we’re talking Tall Thin Sue -

There’s no way she could give birth

Even if she wanted to

Strapped into a boned corset

From the Victorian era - from when she sprung

Nipped in at the waist, in a strait jacket

sucking her breath in

while the Captain jams his foot in the small of her back

and draws tight the white sail ropes

Sue’s stuck in a 1879 time warp continuum

Now, it’s a damned inconvenient thing

But a ship bound for Rotterdam

on a mission: bringing Chinese cargo

went and forced its way up her canal

without asking prior permission, mind you

The Indian crew could be to blame

But they will probably put the blame on

the Taiwanese owners

who were actually a no-show at the party

So, they’ve got an alibi

Whatever….. why, it’s a shame –

the lady has her pride

She’s stuck in this very public humiliating situation,

Embarrassed as hell, like a non-virginal bride

And worst of all,

her reputation has been tarnished now, worldwide

Sue says she deserves compensation

The media has caused great consternation

She doesn’t need the aggravation

Sue’s canal, she maintains, is a private affair

and not surprisingly, she is demanding

they get that damned impediment

ASAP! -out of there!

It’s all lies they were planning it as a 252nd birthday surprise,

And even if they were genuine in their intentions,

It would still be the worst present she’s Ever been Given!

Saturday, 13 March 2021

 

Harry Windsor: What his going means for the UK.  What his coming means for the USA.

 

Harry Windsor’s departure from the UK and the royal family will be viewed historically as the second phase in the progressive end of British royalty. This eventuation was inevitable; evolutionary. It comes as a natural progression from the death of Diana. Diana was said to be pregnant with what would have been a dark-skinned child of a Muslim man with Egyptian heritage: Dodi Fayed, and as his father Mohamed said, "All those two ever did was love each other." Even if the pregnancy rumour was false, they paid for it with their lives.

Another fact that would have had profound significance on the outcome of the Dodi Fayed / Diana relationship is that the leader of the 9/11 attacks on American soil, Mohamed Atta, was the son of Mohamed Fayed’s business partner. Cairo attorney Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta was the father of the lead hijacker. Dodi al Fayed's mother was Samira Kashoggi, sister of weapons dealer Adnan Khashoggi.

Back in 1953, GHW Bush, 41st President of the USA (whose name was linked to Khashoggi's in the Iran-contra affair) and Al Fayed were directors of the Singer Sewing Machine company.

Although 9/11 happened in 2001, and Diana and Dodi died in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in 1997, 4 years earlier, do you really think that MI15 and MI16, the British Military Intelligence, not to mention the equivalent CIA in the USA, were not aware of these connections?

While we are talking about enemies of the state, Meghan had a British male ancestor who was beheaded under Henry VIII's reign. Meghan Markle is related to Lord Hussey, 1st Baron Hussey of Sleaford. This 15th- and 16th-century royal earned knighthood during the Cornish rebellion of 1497. But when he was unable to put down another rebellion four decades later, Henry VIII called for his land, his wealth, and his head. The rot continues down the ages.

Harry has been freer than William to become his own man. He also suffered more from the insidious rumours about his being not the child of his father Charles. Anyone who knows anything about the royal line knows that red hair runs in the royal family. Henry VIII had red hair, and so did Elizabeth I. Detractors would have known this salient fact; yet continually sparked the rumours to ruin the young man’s future, estrange him from the public and deliberately destroy his mental health. Harry, and not William, has been the target since extreme youth, and we have to ask,” Why?” Is it because he has shown signs of following in his mother’s controversial and politically disruptive footsteps?


Apart from the ignominious history of “traitorous” associations both in the Diana line and the Markle line, Harry and Meghan are blood related through Meghan's father Thomas and Harry's great-grandmother, the Queen Mother. The families share a common ancestor, Ralph Bowes, a High Sheriff of County Durham in England in the 15th century. Diana and Charles, Harry’s parents, were direct descendants of Henry VII, the Tudor King. 

Whether Harry’s telling Oprah that his son Archie will not have a royal title was a complaint or just a statement of plain fact, is not clear. If the former, (a lamentation), Meghan and Harry officially opted out of the royal family, so they cannot reasonably expect their son to receive the title of Prince.

It would not be surprising if they are having difficulty adjusting to their new status, since Harry reputedly had to rely first on William’s, then his mother's money, once he departed the shores of the UK permanently to reside in the USA. The royal coffers are no longer open to them.

Whether they realize it or not; the couple have chosen to live in a country that is in the early stages of a societal revolution, which revolt has only been quelled for a time; perhaps staved off for a generation. Bernie Sanders has finally achieved his lifelong goal: that of awakening the hearts, minds and souls of his people. I think the USA is only a generation away from becoming the Socialist Democratic Republic of America. The oligarchical nouveau rich, like Oprah and now Meghan and Harry, who have joined their ranks, (merging old money with new money), will likely find the changed political climate that Archie will grow up in, not altogether to their liking.

But then again, Harry could surprise. He is a smart young man, and his heart is in the right place, with the people, as was his mother’s. He will not say or do anything, I think, that is likely to be out of step with the will of the people, and in the best interests of the masses. I would like to see him enter politics in the USA, as a Democratic Socialist. He is capable of doing that; but given the assasinative history of the USA, it would be a very dangerous, if honourable, step.

The recent interview with Oprah, who was the driving force both financial and media wise behind Barack Obama, is very suggestive of a political push in the behind of the young Harry Windsor in the direction of the White House.  True, he was not born in the USA, and currently the law there states he must be to run for President. Laws can change. But Meghan, on the other hand, is born the same day and month as Barack Obama: on 4th August, and she was born in Los Angeles, where the couple reside. Oprah would be quick to discern the Kennedyesque appeal, not only in Harry, but also in Meghan, as a fitting First Lady, reminiscent of Michelle Obama.  In fact, Harry bears a resemblance to red-headed left-wing “Progressive” (aka Democratic Socialist) Joe Kennedy III, born 4th October, 1980. Harry Windsor, born 15th September, 1984, is only 4 years younger.

Prince Harry served in the Army for ten years, rising to the rank of Captain and undertaking two tours of Afghanistan. He continues to work in support of his fellow servicemen, promoting support for wounded men and women as they adapt to life post-injury.  America, in case you had not noticed, is an extremely militaristic nation. Not a day goes by that they are not thanking someone for their service. That applies to ordinary, everyday Americans as well as their leaders. America loves a serviceman.

On the face of it, it seems extreme to compare Harry Windsor to an historical war general, but in some respects, Harry Windsor seems to have the potential of a young Bolívar, the wealthy and privileged slave owner who became a champion of his people, renouncing slavery and leading a popular revolution of disparate ethic groups that freed many suffering peoples from the yoke of imperialist Spanish rule. Bolívar exhausted the family fortune, dying in poverty at the premature age of 47 from what was then diagnosed as “tuberculosis”; though some experts today say the symptoms resemble arsenic poisoning.

 

Simón Bolívar (24th July 1783 to 17th December 1830), was a South American general and statesman who brought political independence to six present-day nations. Called the Liberator, he was the greatest military figure of South America. He was born in Caracas, Venezuela, then part of the Hispanic colonial empire. His parents belonged to the aristocratic upper class but as Creoles they were discriminated against because of their race and culture. His mother, who died young, habitually gave him an umbrella to shield his skin from the sun, telling him that it would not make a good impression either at home or abroad if he allowed his skin to become too dark. So, colourism was alive and kicking back then, and it continues today, right around the world, within many cultures. It is not only an affliction of white people.  


At his mother’s death, Simon Bolivar was double orphaned at the age of 9. The fatherless boy early showed traits of independence and a strong will. He was sent to Madrid in 1799 to complete his education, paid for under his mother’s inheritance which was being managed by his uncle. Thus, the proper instruction was secured for the young aristocrat, which included the dubious acquaintance with the decadent court of Charles IV and the noble families of Madrid.

At the age of 18 Bolívar married the love of his life, Maria Teresa de Toro, from one of the noble families. In 1802 the couple went to live in Caracas, where after only 6 months of wedded life the young wife died of yellow fever. This tragedy caused a metamorphosis within Bolívar and he vowed never to marry again. The young soldier dedicated the rest of his life to accomplishing the impossible: the liberation of Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru and Panama; in which mission, against incredible odds, he succeeded.


The Bolivarian countries

Today, Caracas, birthplace of Bolivar, is considered to be one of the most dangerous cities in the world. Trump was behind the coup by right wing Juan Guaido, who attempted to overthrow socialist leader Nicolas Maduro. As political governmental alliances shift globally, so too does support for different leaderships around the world. A change to democratic socialism of the kind introduced to the USA by Bernie Sanders, will inevitably radically change America's military place and political face in the world. 

   

Pamela Lillian Valemont BA Film & TV  Production. Australia.